[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Octave package standard
- From: Toshio Kuratomi <a badger gmail com>
- To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Octave package standard
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:13:42 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm currently working with octave upstream to get their new package
> management system in line with Fedora so that we can easily build RPMs
> with it. I'd like to get a Fedora package standard configured and
> approved at the same time. I've put a draft on the wiki at:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Octave
>
> Some further information:
>
> - Currently octave uses the /usr/libexec tree to install the .oct files.
> These are really shared libraries. It does use an arch/api versioned
> directory, e.g.:
>
> /usr/libexec/octave/packages/java-1.2.1/i386-redhat-linux-gnu-api-v26/
>
> Some other package files (PKG_ADD/PKG_DEL) get added there too.
>
This is the only part that needs more clarification to me. If the .oct
files are really shared libraries it seems that they belong in
%{_libdir}. libexec is more useful for binaries that shouldn't be
multilib like helper programs that are invoked by other programs on the
system and need to match arch with the invoking program for them to work
correctly.
- -Toshio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG/URWX6yAic2E7kgRAgSbAJ9ruRihsv5LqatTncAALwzDPNIoIwCfdgRC
EEDwYzDRgWDR4/XRba8QlJc=
=luEz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]