[Fedora-packaging] Putting the new GConf Schema Guidelines into effect

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 17:16:49 UTC 2009


On 06/12/2009 09:26 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> The new GConf Schema Guidelines (
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GConf_Scriptlets_%28draft%29 ) have been
>> approved by FPC and ratified by FESCo.
> 
> Doesn't the GPLv2+ license of the macros mean that they can only be used by 
> GPLv2+ (or compatible) packages?  If not, why not?  If yes, why not use the 
> original author's LGPLv2.1+ license?
> 
Thanks for catching that!  I don't know about the legality of using the
macro in compatible packages but the GPLv2+ was either a typo or a
misread on my part.  I've fixed the page to have LGPLv2+ as the original
author did.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090612/a92af402/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list