[Fedora-packaging] Renaming of upstream project/rpm/binary

[Fernando Nasser]

For a similar case I made the submission as a new package and explained there it was a rename for expediting the approval.

I believe this works better as there is a workflow driven by the flags.

Regards,
Fernando
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Federico Hernandez" <ultrafredde at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" <fedora-packaging at redhat.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:20:28 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Renaming of upstream project/rpm/binary

>>> Obsoletes foo <= 1.8
>>>
>>> Please, do not forget to use the '<= 1.8' bit.  Unversioned Obsoletes are a very bad thing.

THX.

Regarding the technical part of the rpm. But I might need to request a
new CVS repo is that orrect. Should I do this through the original
bugzilla for the old package or should I submit a new bugzilla with
corresponding cvs request.

/Federico

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging