[Fedora-packaging] Digging up an old dead thread ...
Bruno Wolff III
bruno at wolff.to
Wed Jun 24 19:15:26 UTC 2009
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 20:22:40 +0200,
steve <steve at lonetwin.net> wrote:
> b. About other CC licensed content -- A lot of the available content is
> licensed with the Non-Commercial restriction, which is considered as a
> Bad License according to the wiki page on licensing. Why is
> non-commercial only restriction considered bad ? ...and is there an
> alternative to including this in the official Fedora repository -- for
> instance the rpm fusion repository ?
The problem is that it isn't free. The nonfree rpmfusion repo includes
at least some packages with no commercial use restrictions.
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list