[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] libspotify
- From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>
- To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] libspotify
- Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:35:04 -0400
On 06/28/2009 08:41 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Paul wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm considering packaging libspotify (it's a library for accessing the
>> spotify music service), but it has a couple of problems.
>>
>> The licence is MIT, which is fine. However, for a user to be able
>> connect to spotify, they have to email spotify to obtain a file which
>> registers them. It also requires a .la file which is against the
>> packaging rules.
>>
>> Spotify have very little interest in their library, so there would
>> probably be little that they would do to remove this .la file and
>> without it, the package won't install locally.
>>
>> Any comments or advice on this?
>
> Question:
> Does this package make any software linked to it work on the fedora
> legal queue and have an assortment of frogs?
>
> zing!
No. I use properly versioned shared libraries, and have support for Pam.
~spot
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]