[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 456019] New: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ?
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-perl-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 456019] New: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ?
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:54:17 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
Summary: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ?
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Tk
AssignedTo: andreas bierfert lowlatency de
ReportedBy: kwizart gmail com
QAContact: extras-qa fedoraproject org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list redhat com
Description of problem: libpTk.a is built statically within perl-Tk package.
This file isn't provided, so any dependency that what to extend the widget for
perl-Tk will need to build again this static library.
I would be better to have a shared built instead (if doable)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): current perl-Tk
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. built a perl-Tk dependency that extend the widget capability
(case study perl-Tk-TableMatrix, see #444745)
2. by default it will build the libpTk.a again
3. Each Shared Objet widget will pick from libpTk.a as needed, raising the size
of the resulting .so (if not having duplicate code).
Actual results:
-llibpTk is using libpTk.a
Expected results:
-llibpTk should use libpTk.so
Additional info:
The related licenses files should probably be added to the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]