On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 23:25, Valdis Kletnieks vt edu wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:12:29 EDT, Colin Walters <walters redhat com> said: > > > I added stuff to try to fix this into policy, will be in the next > > upload. Patch attached, let me know if it works for you... > > Almost right, it needs lvm_etc_t as well - fixed patch attached, > thanks for the fast feedback... Ah, that was actually a typo in my original patch. If you change the r_dir_file(bootloader_t, lvm_t) to r_dir_file(bootloader_t, lvm_etc_t) does it work?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part