[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Installing new policy?
- From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
- To: fedora-selinux-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Installing new policy?
- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:56:43 -0500
Russell Coker wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:53, Tom Mitchell <mitch48 yahoo com> wrote:
If you're pushing new policy that actually fixes bugs will it break site
policy? I would be unhappy if my co-lo box had this line changed. ;-)
# uncomment to allow ssh logins as sysadm_r:sysadm_t
define(`ssh_sysadm_login')
This is a difficult issue. For Debian I have it ask a heap of questions at
policy upgrade time about replacing policy files, but lots of people seem to
dislike that.
One possibility is to replace files that have not been changed. However that
means that if a macro changes without the calling code changing then it could
break policy compiles.
RPM should leave the tunable.te file and create a tunable.te.rpmnew file.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]