Re: policy packages

[Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>]

Richard Hally wrote:

> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> > Policy rename dilemma.  I have a version of policy ready to go that 
> > supports both strict and targeted policy.   The version I wrote 
> > creates targeted policy as policy and policy-sources and the strict 
> > as policy-strict and policy-strict-sources.  The problem with this is 
> > that if I put it in Rawhide people upgrading will switch from strict 
> > policy to relaxed and require a relabel.  If I change it to strict 
> > equals policy and policy-sources, with policy-targeted and 
> > policy-targeted-sources, than I am stuck with that even though 
> > policy-targeted will be the default in FC3, which seems wrong.
> > Comments?
> >
> > Dan
> > --
> > fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> > fedora-selinux-list redhat com
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
> If "targeted" will be the default going forward, it seems that the 
> thing to do is make the change now. A one time relabel at this stage 
> is not as bad as having to make a switch later.
> For those that want the "strict" , they can set up the links the way 
> they prefer after the update.
> Is the "strict" policy close to what is now in place?

Strict is the current policy with several fixes.

Dan

> Richard Hally
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list