[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: texrel_shlib_t
- From: "Christopher J. PeBenito" <cpebenito tresys com>
- To: Paul Howarth <paul city-fan org>
- Cc: fedora-selinux-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: texrel_shlib_t
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:42:30 -0400
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 12:18 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> texrel_shlib_t is I believe an alias for textrel_shlib_t. Is it just
> there for historical reasons to support a typo someone made whilst
> developing policy?
texrel_shlib_t was the original name of the type, and it was renamed to
textrel_shlib_t. texrel_shlib_t is an alias of textrel_shlib_t for
compatibility.
> There are still some instances of texrel_shlib_t in the policy:
[cut]
> Should these really be textrel_shlib_t or am I missing something subtle?
They should, but it doesn't hurt for them to be texrel_shlib_t since its
an alias of textrel_shlib_t. I have fixed these in upstream refpolicy.
--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]