[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Problem with SELinux and Postfix (sending from Python scripts)
- From: Jeff Coffler <jeff-list-fedora taltos com>
- To: "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-selinux-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Problem with SELinux and Postfix (sending from Python scripts)
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:56:31 -0700
Is this an SELinux policy problem? How can I go about fixing this? I'd
prefer to run with SELinux enabled ...
# grep postfix_spool /var/log/message | audit2allow -M postfixpickup
# semodule -i postfixpickup.pp
Will fix it for now.
I will update policy to allow searching of this directory
Hmm, this didn't work ...
[root jeff]# grep postfix_spool /var/log/messages | audit2allow -M
postfixpickup
Generating type enforcment file: postfixpickup.te
Compiling policy
checkmodule -M -m -o postfixpickup.mod postfixpickup.te
semodule_package -o postfixpickup.pp -m postfixpickup.mod
******************** IMPORTANT ***********************
In order to load this newly created policy package into the kernel,
you are required to execute
semodule -i postfixpickup.pp
[root jeff]# semodule -i postfixpickup.pp
slimserver homedir /usr/local/slimserver or its parent directory conflicts
with a
defined context in /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts,
/usr/sbin/genhomedircon will not create a new context.
[root jeff]# grep -i slim /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts
[root jeff]#
I'm not sure why it's complaining about slimserver since there's no "slim"
in that file. I could deinstall that to do the semodule command, then
reinstall. Or I could wait until you guys push out the next SELinux policy,
then enable SELinux.
Suggestions?
Thanks!
-- Jeff
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]