Tom London wrote:
The problem was in the preceding policy package that did not have the if [ $1 = 0]; then Call so when it got updated this code executed. IE the spec file thought it was being updated. The newer policy packages should handle this correctly.On 4/27/06, Tom London <selinux gmail com> wrote:I can verify this. I separately updated to today's 'selinux-policy*' packages, and check /etc/selinux/config before and afterwards. Before: SELINUX=enforcing Afterwards SELINUX=disabled tomCould the offending script be the postuninstall script of selinux-policy:
postuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): if [ $1 = 0 ]; then setenforce 0 2> /dev/null if [ ! -s /etc/selinux/config ]; then echo "SELINUX=disabled" > /etc/selinux/config elsesed -i 's/^SELINUX=.*/SELINUX=disabled/g' /etc/selinux/configfi fiI also noticed that after the 'yum update', my system was in permissive mode....tom -- Tom London -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list redhat com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list