[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: selinux-policy.spec wierdness?



On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:07:11 -0400,
  Valdis Kletnieks vt edu wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 10:53:16 +0300, Maxim Britov said:
> > On Tue, 09 May 2006 18:07:01 -0400
> >  Valdis Kletnieks vt edu wrote:
> > 
> > > Am looking at selinux-policy-2.2.38-1.src.rpm.  Does anybody know
> > > why there isn't a %build section in the .SPEC file?  I was *hoping*
> > > to do a 'rpmbuild -bc' to assist in debugging an outstanding problem
> > > I'm having with strict policy, but apparently all the building gets
> > > done in the %install. Blech.
> > 
> > Confirm. selinux-policy-strict-2.2.38-1 in fc5 updates is broken :(
> > 
> >   Updating  : selinux-policy-strict        ####################### [ 4/10]
> > libsepol.scope_copy_callback: authlogin: Duplicate declaration in module: typ
> e/attribute system_chkpwd_t
> > libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed
> > semodule:  Failed!
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188060
> 
> is already open for the system_chkpwd_t problem.  I came across the specfile
> problem while trying to debug that problem.
> 
> The interesting part is that Horst opened that bug against 2.2.29, I finally
> got fed up with rpm complaining and found the bugzilla - and nobody else has
> attached themselves to the cc: list. For a while, I was wondering if Horst and
> I were the only two trying to use the Rawhide 'strict' policy...

I have been seeing this for a while in FC5 and have an open ticket (190012)
that I am about to update saying the problem isn't fixed with 2.2.38-1.fc5.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]