[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: Data access to two daemon





fedora-selinux-list-request redhat com wrote:
Send fedora-selinux-list mailing list submissions to
	fedora-selinux-list redhat com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	fedora-selinux-list-request redhat com

You can reach the person managing the list at
	fedora-selinux-list-owner redhat com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-selinux-list digest..."
  

Today's Topics: 1. Re: Data access to two daemon (Stephen Smalley)



Subject:
Re: Data access to two daemon
From:
Stephen Smalley <sds tycho nsa gov>
Date:
Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:50:38 -0400
To:
Arthur Pemberton <pemboa gmail com>
To:
Arthur Pemberton <pemboa gmail com>
CC:
Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>, fedora-selinux-list redhat com
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Precedence:
junk
MIME-Version:
1.0
References:
<16de708d0708211355x744747ech1cffd5e2da5a2daf mail gmail com>
In-Reply-To:
<16de708d0708211355x744747ech1cffd5e2da5a2daf mail gmail com>
Message-ID:
<1187787038 1451 284 camel moss-spartans epoch ncsc mil>
Content-Type:
text/plain
Message:
1

On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 15:55 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
  
I have a personal server setup with SELinux in targeted mode.

I would like to allow rw access over these files to Samba, and ro
access to these files to httpd.

In my current setup, SELinux requires the security context of the
respective daemon to allow access to them.

Since I gave Samba access more priority, the current context is:
root:object_r:samba_share_t

The files are not owned by root, they are currently chowned pembo13:comrades.

Please advise on the best method to arrange for the access that I seem
to require.
    

man samba_selinux seems to suggest using public_content_rw_t on the file
and setting the allow_smbd_anon_write boolean.

  
I do that in FC6, and it does work.

Regards,
John Griffiths

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]