[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: selinux-policy-2.5.4
- From: Stephen Smalley <sds tycho nsa gov>
- To: Steve G <linux_4ever yahoo com>
- Cc: Fedora SELinux list <fedora-selinux-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: selinux-policy-2.5.4
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:46:10 -0500
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 12:15 -0800, Steve G wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am curious about the testing process for policy releases. Seems like everytime
> a new upstream policy is pulled in, we suddenly have a bunch of avcs. For the
> newest policy, 2.5.4, I have all these:
>
> allow avahi_t unlabeled_t : packet { recv send };
> allow bluetooth_t lib_t : file execute_no_trans;
> allow mount_t security_t : filesystem getattr;
> allow postfix_local_t mail_spool_t : file append;
> allow postfix_local_t unlabeled_t : packet send;
> allow postfix_master_t security_t : filesystem getattr;
> allow restorecon_t security_t : filesystem getattr;
> allow setrans_t security_t : filesystem getattr;
> allow setroubleshootd_t mail_spool_t : lnk_file read;
> allow setroubleshootd_t security_t : filesystem getattr;
> allow vpnc_t security_t : filesystem getattr;
> allow vpnc_t unlabeled_t : packet { recv send };
>
> These are simply from booting and connecting to the network. I haven't even tried
> to start X or do any serious work.
The security_t:filesystem getattr ones would be from your libselinux
patch (not yet merged, at least upstream).
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]