Re: Worrying AVC messages

[Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>]

Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 13:13, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>   
> > Some of the denials you listed suggested a problem with device node
> > labeling, so those bear investigating.  What you have done is put into
> > place a temporary workaround to let your system operate until a correct
> > fix is determined.  Ultimately, clean fixes for the underlying issues
> > should go into the upstream policy, which is why it is important to
> > report such denials to this list or the upstream selinux list.
> >
> >     
> Please tell me if I can do anything to help in the way of investigation or 
> testing.  As a non-programmer this is the only way I can pay back for the 
> help I get.
>
> Anne
>   
>   
There were two different types of avc in your email.  The first 
concerning postfix should be fixed in the next update.   Getting the 
/dev/video1 to come up properly is the other.   Something is wrong in 
the way you are telling udev to create these devices, unfortunately I 
have no idea, how to fix.
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list