[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: periodic policy audits
- From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
- To: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-selinux-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: periodic policy audits
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:44:43 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Again, looking through the policy I see sections for policy
> to confine cardmgr, /etc/hotplug scripts, updfstab, etc. Do
> we do any routine policy updates to purge obsolete policy?
>
> If not, should we?
>
> Bill
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
The problem is we are using the same upstream policy for
RHEL4/RHEL5/Fedora7-9/Debian/Gentoo/Ubunto/...
So while one distribution may not use it, others might.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAke+0csACgkQrlYvE4MpobMimgCfQp37B8OwRRn0jLJ7/Vu8//PU
9/gAnj6ZFwSl9JR5V7PiMoWGcMp9c4HN
=hBUY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]