[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Performance difference
- From: Stephen Smalley <sds tycho nsa gov>
- To: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org>
- Cc: fedora-selinux-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Performance difference
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:42:14 -0400
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 21:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any performance differences between having selinux disabled via
> a the configuration file vs disabling it in the bootloader? If so. is
> this considered a bug?
There shouldn't be any difference - the late disable unregisters the
SELinux LSM hooks and NetFilter hooks altogether, so SELinux is no
longer on the code path for the kernel operations.
Back in Fedora Core 2 days, there was a big difference, because
the /etc/sysconfig/selinux disable wasn't a real disable - it just
booted permissive with no policy loaded. The runtime disable support in
the kernel came later and was included in Fedora Core 3 and later.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]