[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: selinux-policy-3.3.1-51 and browser_confine_unconfined
- From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
- To: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefan seekline net>
- Cc: fedora-selinux-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: selinux-policy-3.3.1-51 and browser_confine_unconfined
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:46:42 -0400
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> In policy version 3.3.1-42 a boolean browser_confine_unconfined exists
> to control firefox. Since version 3.3.1-51 it's gone and only one for
> guest exists. I checked the RPM changelog but nothing helpful. What
> happened to the other one? Does there also exist one for staff_t etc.?
>
> Best regards
> Stefan
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
No only for domains that explicitly call the mozilla_per_role_template()
interface. Currently only xguest has this.
So if you wanted to add it back for unconfined_t you could build a
policy module with
mozilla_per_role_template(unconfined, unconfined_t, unconfined_r)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]