Re: init_script_type versus init_script_file

[Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Carter wrote:
> Good morning.
> 
> I'm trying to build a module package but I'm running into issues with
> these macros. When I build in my FC9 development environment, I require
> init_script_file. When I use mock, it will only build using
> init_script_type. Why the difference, and what do I do about it?
> 
> While I might expect issues across versions, I don't expect a difference
> when my mock target and my build environment are the same.
> 
> Also, if FC10 is different from FC9, how do I handle that?
> 
> TIA
> - Dave
> 
> -- 
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
init_script_file is what you should use.  That is what upstream wants.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkGEZ0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNadgCgl2r7MXSlnl6JDSGjkGmAOF9d
qaIAoKWgRaDHkiGBuKphhPrpD53FBp6A
=QyPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----