[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: f10 vs selinux again.
- From: Joe Nall <joe nall com>
- To: Gene Heskett <gene heskett verizon net>
- Cc: fedora-selinux-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: f10 vs selinux again.
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:27:22 -0600
On Feb 28, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
...
# This file controls the state of SELinux on the system.
# SELINUX= can take one of these three values:
# enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced.
# permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing.
# disabled - No SELinux policy is loaded.
SELINUX=enabeled
enabeled (other than being misspelled) is not a valid choice
(enforcing, permissive, disabled)
...
[root coyote radeon]# sestatus
SELinux status: enabled
SELinuxfs mount: /selinux
Current mode: permissive
Mode from config file: error (Success)
because the mode from the config file is not correct
joe
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]