Re: f10 vs selinux again.

[Gene Heskett <gene heskett verizon net>]

On Saturday 28 February 2009, Joe Nall wrote:
>On Feb 28, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> ...
>> # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system.
>> # SELINUX= can take one of these three values:
>> #	enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced.
>> #	permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing.
>> #	disabled - No SELinux policy is loaded.
>> SELINUX=enabeled
>
>enabeled (other than being misspelled) is not a valid choice
>(enforcing, permissive, disabled)

Duh, by George you're right.  But I can't see fixing that till we get the 
base.pp problem fixed.

>> ...
>> [root coyote radeon]# sestatus
>> SELinux status:                 enabled
>> SELinuxfs mount:                /selinux
>> Current mode:                   permissive
>> Mode from config file:          error (Success)
>
>because the mode from the config file is not correct
>
>joe


-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
I either want less decadence or more chance to participate in it.