Re: Moving /etc/fonts/ to fonts_t?

[Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> 	In my Fedora 10 system, all fonts under /usr/share/fonts
> are of the fonts_t type, while the fontconfig files under /etc/fonts
> are of the default etc_t type. I think it would make sense to move
> the whole /etc/fonts directory under the fonts_t type, so that user
> can easily say "this domain can use fonts" and be done without allowing
> the domain to read the whole /etc directory and files.
> 
> 	What do you think about it? Does it make sense to modify the default
> Fedora policy according to these lines?
> 
> -Yenya
> 
yes.  If there are fonts in /etc/fonts it should be labeled fonts_t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmxLbEACgkQrlYvE4MpobM49ACfQ6qNY37cS85ke9kw2hrYCNuB
SE0AoMuKcplP2fX2Gy4mVGOwHyv+kuy0
=Z7uc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----