pam src rpm replaced?

[Nils Philippsen]

On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 09:10, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> 
> >-jef"wouldn't it be fun to see what the typical number of new bugs a
> >typical red hat developer gets every week? I wonder how much time it
> >would time to write a "just to say hi" comment for each new bug"spaleta 
> 
> I guarantee you it wouldn't be fun.  ;o)
> 
> For others interested:
> 
> Way too many people add comments to a bug report asking for a
> status update on their reported problem, or some similar request.  
> In general, if a developer hasn't added any comments to a report,
> there is no new status to report, and they will get to it in
> time, depending on their various priorities.  The more time spent 

Despite that (and that is my personal opinion), if a serious bug doesn't
get accepted (i.e. stays NEW) for several months (or isn't active for a
very long time) giving a heads up to the developer (maybe as a PM) might
be justifiable.

On the other hand, I don't consider a missing BuildRequires: as serious
;-).

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20030824/9caa2ee6/attachment.sig>