2.6.0-test1 kernel? gcc 3.3 compiler?

[Dennis Gilmore]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Once upon a time at band camp Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:56 pm, Gerald Henriksen 
wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:09:14 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
> >  at the risk of being perhaps a little too far out there
> >on the bleeding edge, i'm thinking of dumping the 2.6.0-test1
> >kernel on my severn system today, just to push the boundaries.
>
> I ran 2.6.0-test1 yesterday with only one noticeable problem (couldn't
> access cdrom) which I didn't have time to look into.

i actualy did have the cd issue one time i tried to access a cd  modprobe 
ide-cd fixed that
Dennis

>
> >  in addition, what are the implications of upgrading to
> >gcc 3.3?  and what other RPMs would have to go along with
> >that to have a usable system?
>
> The beta comes with gcc 3.3 as the default compiler (and gcc32 3.2.3
> for the 2.4 kernel).
>
>
>
> --
> Rhl-beta-list mailing list
> Rhl-beta-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/H+Yu4hBQ1unFjm4RAjvXAJ9E/jdfJdteGXrZcsFHJdTzZoz7PQCgmiL0
f2YeigSp6/rbMaoL0RmP/fY=
=5wvp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----