ntfs
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at mindspring.com
Sat Jul 26 08:53:18 UTC 2003
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Daniel Huettl wrote:
> Please consider including the ntfs module. It is an absolute nuisance to
> have to compile it oneself. The module works perfectly well, and people
> have been clamouring to have it included for over a year now:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65749
one of the comments from a RH person at that bug from last year
states that it must be "legally possible/sensible" to do so,
neither of which seems to make much sense.
it must clearly be legal since the source for the module is
included -- you simply have to compile it in. i don't know if
this is an issue any more, but saying it's illegal to ship an
NTFS-enabled kernel is like saying, "i can't sell you a loaded
gun. but, hey, i can sell you an unloaded gun. and then i can
just sell you the bullets separately at the same time."
and what about it being "sensible"? as long as using NTFS
access in read-only mode is safe, i see no problem. if people
want to take a chance and use read-write mode, that's their
choice. but i'm hoping there's no *conceivable* way that simply
reading an NTFS partition can corrupt data. any module that does
that is unspeakably badly written, no?
so, if RH doesn't want to enable read-only HTFS support out of
the box, it would be interesting to know why not.
rday
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list