Rant about not being able to test X config in anaconda

Robert L Cochran cochranb at speakeasy.net
Tue Jul 29 03:24:44 UTC 2003


Yes, I agree. And then when more functionality is added to firstboot it
becomes even more important to complete it normally or rerun broken
firstboot functions. X configuration needs a lot of attention.

Bob Cochran 

On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 16:15, Nick Marsh wrote:
> It really bothers me that there is no way to test X config in anaconda. If anaconda doesnt probe your settings correctly, and/or you don't set them correctly, it becomes a challenge to get past firstboot.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99564
> 
> Anyone else have thoughts on this?
> 
> 
> nick marsh
> nmarsh1 at mac.com
> 
> 
> --
> Rhl-beta-list mailing list
> Rhl-beta-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20030728/26219b68/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list