Re: RHEL 3.0 or Fedora for a 'production environment' ?

["shrek-m gmx de" <shrek-m gmx de>]

Res wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:
>  
>
> > Support is one thing.  You could always count on your internal guys for
> > support.  But what about software backports?  Were your internal guys
> > rolling their own updates and pushing them out to your production servers?
> > Think about it....   
>
> [...] I cant, some of our servers are still running 7.3, cause we knew RH will
> put out errata if its seriou enough, general updates who cares, get the
> tarball, looks like thats how we'll be updateing untill we decide which
> way to go, update by tarballs in future, or move onto slackware or suse.

lol SuSE,
i personally wouldn´t go back to suse.
i had bad experience with the suse-support and i don´t like yast.
but this is my opinion.

http://www.suse.de/us/private/download/updates/index.html

http://redhat.com/apps/support/errata/

--
shrek-m