Questioning RH's decisions to remain a viable and independent company?

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:16:03 -0500 (EST), William Hooper wrote:

> 
> jdow said:
> 
> > http://www.debian.org/ might be more useful, Mike. I hate to go. But
> > I am bailing out after Red Hat cuts RH 9 support short.
> 
> IIRC Red Hat 9 EOL was announced when it was released (or soon after). 
> How is it that "Red Hat cuts RH 9 support short"?

The errata support period policy was announced end of 2002, some time
after Red Hat Linux 8.0 and hence long before Red Hat Linux 9.

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20031106/a22e32b4/attachment.sig>