would someone kindly clarify this paragaph,please (RH business model)

[Michael Schwendt]

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:35:01 +0100, Martin Stricker wrote:

> As far as I understand the GPL, you may charge for the software. The GPL
> is about source code, not money. 

> You may even deny the redistribution of
> your *binaries* (like RHEL does).

They cannot and do not do that with the GNU GPL'ed (or similarly
"free") portions of their products:
http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_us_3.html (Appendix 1 section 1)

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20031027/9b4925c7/attachment.sig>