Would busybox be more valuable, statically linked?

Gordon Messmer yinyang at eburg.com
Tue Sep 9 06:05:44 UTC 2003


Mark Mielke wrote:
> 
> Of course, I am mostly thinking about init=/sbin/busybox as a kernel option
> to aid during recovery in cases where /sbin/sash does not provide enough
> functionality... :-)

In recovery situations, what functionality do you need from the init 
process that sash does not give you?






More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list