Re; 4KSTACKS again.

[Michael Kearey]

Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Michael Kearey <mutk at iprimus.com.au> said:
> 
>>So maybe there are other obligations graphics manufacturors are under, 
>>and it isn't pure evil motivations?
> 
> 
> Nowhere did I say it was "evil".  Their choice may well have been to do
> nothing or to release a binary-only module, due to license issues.  They
> still made the choice to release binary-only modules, something known
> and documented to be an interface that could change daily and be
> incompatible between builds of the same kernel.

The point I wanted to make is that it probably isn't just a 'sound 
business decision'.

The 'pure evil ' bit was just lame humour.

Cheers,
Michael