selinux off by default in FC2t3 ? [was Re: fam: Permission denied.... avc denied...?]

[Matt Hansen]

On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 18:30, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 	Yeah, I missed the whys and wherefores too. It may only be a temporary
> thing, though - e.g. off by default for FC2t3 ?
> 
> 	Someone else who knows what's going on could clarify ...
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark.

Hi Mark,

Yeah, off by default for only FC2t3 is probably the case. Let us hope
so. :-o However, that is going to mean less testing and focus on it for
the final test, which is basically the release candidate for the final
core release. So maybe someone care to explain the problems with
shipping SELinux in enforcing/permissive mode for test3? Thanks. ;-)

Regards,
-Matt 
-- 
"Would you buy a car with the hood welded shut?"
 - Bob Young on the benefits of the open source development model.
mhelios - www.fedoraforum.org 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040420/f5dd3588/attachment.sig>