[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rpm questions
- From: Thomas Zehetbauer <thomasz hostmaster org>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: rpm questions
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 01:32:53 +0200
> rpm -e --nodeps packagename (repeat if needed)
> rpm --install packagename.rpm
> rpm --verify packagename.
Of course this needs an --allmatches for the --erase step and make sure
you don't remove any packages RPM depends on.
I ended up doing this for *many* packages after trying to update my
existing i386 installation to the AMD64 architecture. Maybe RPM could be
enhanced to do the first two steps in one operation. I would also
appreciate a rpm.static binary to aid recovery.
As posted before I am still getting --verify errors (mostly concerning
the timestamp of translations or documentation files) for some packages
which come in both 32 and 64 bit versions, e.g. popt. Is this expected?
Tom
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]