[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: header/RPM mismatch
- From: seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: header/RPM mismatch
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:10:44 -0400
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:25, Fulko Hew sita aero wrote:
> ... some context snipped for brevity...
>
> >> If yum is supposed to replace up2date, then its config file, should be a
> >> superset
> >> of up2date.
> >
> >Who said yum is supposed to replace up2date?
>
> If yum is not to replace up2date for updating, then why does it exist?
> What itch is _it_ scratching that up2date
> wouldn't/shouldn't/couldn't scratch?
>
> Or is it another case of 'Not Invented Here' syndrome?
>
Let's get this straight. Yum wasn't written by red hat. It was written
by me in large parts with contributions from a number of other people. I
do not work for red hat. I work for duke and I wrote yum on my free
time.
So yum is not a victim of NIH.
Let's move on.
-sv
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]