[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: header/RPM mismatch
- From: "-=Brian Truter=-" <brian famvid com>
- To: "'For testers of Fedora Core development releases'" <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: header/RPM mismatch
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:22:02 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-test-list-bounces redhat com
> [mailto:fedora-test-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of
> Fulko Hew sita aero
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 4:17 PM
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> Subject: RE: header/RPM mismatch
>
>
> Whats wrong, is that for some reason (that I do not
> understand) this morning I had the various apps reporting the
> following various needs:
>
> package rhn up2date yum
> -------------------------------------------------
> perl-XML-Twig need it need it need it
> perl-Net-DNS need it need it
> gaim need it
> rpmdb-fedora need it
>
> I'd have to think that if they were all using the same info,
> they'd be reporting the same thing. Wouldn't they?
> The fact that three different apps are reporting three
> different 'apparent' states of my system is disconcerting.
> Thats why I don't know who to believe.
> And yes, I know that rpm -q tells what I've got But this
> discussion thread revolves around:
> 'which of these packages _really_ need updating'?
> (Not a yum/up2date/apt-get/etc flame war.)
This really looks to me like yum is looking at more repositories than
up2date is. I don't really understand why you have rhn listed as a client
here, as that is what up2date is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]