[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: What happened to version.h?
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- To: fedora-test-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: What happened to version.h?
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:02:47 -0500
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 14:12 -0500, Janina Sajka wrote:
> I've just installed FC2 without a any particular problem--all looks OK.
> But, I tried to compile a newer ALSA and it failed for lack of
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h. Indeed, when I look in the
> source tree--which is certainly there--version.h is not there. Is there
> some new procedure re the 2.6 kernels that I'm unaware of?
ALSA should be look in /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build not /usr/src/
linux. This is the Linux Approved Way. And with the 2.6 kernels, the
headers are being included in the individual packages instead of all in
the kernel-source package which a) makes things a lot simpler and b)
makes it so that you don't have to install krenel-source just to build a
kernel module.
Cheers,
Jeremy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]