Include k3b in Fedora Core 2?

[Demond James]

Michael Schwendt wrote:

>On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:45:25 +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I'm surprised that k3b did not make its way to Fedora Core 2 test 1. I 
>>know where I can get the rpms from, but I would like it to be shipped in 
>>the FC isos and installed by default.
>>
>>Contrary to xcdroast and gtoaster, k3b is (at last) a very easy to use 
>>cd burning interface. In addition, it looks very stable and I never had 
>>significant issues with it. In addition, its development team is still 
>>active (I don't see much going on with the other 2).
>>
>>So, is it too late to add k3b to Fedora Core 2? If there's a lack of 
>>space, I think that k3b deserves to be part of the release more than 
>>xcdroast and gtoaster.
>>
>>Users would love the change!
>>
>>    What do you think?
>>    
>>
>
>If anyone wants to help me get the k3b 0.11.4 update for fedora.us
>approved and published, that would be much appreciated:
>
>  https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1106
>
>It builds fine on FC 1 and FC 1.90 and works with both KDE and GNOME.
>
>  
>
Is there an option to build without k3bsetup2 so that gnome users don't 
have to install the KDEbase package?