it's clear that if someone finds a serious bug in samba during testing, it should be patched if possible so the people who *are* testing it can continue.
this sort of update is clearly different from, say, upgrading from KDE 3.1.5 to 3.2, for example, which would be proposed just for getting new
features. are you seriously suggesting that you don't recognize the fundamental difference between upgrading because you want a new package with newer features, and upgrading to fix a significant bug?
KDE 3.2 23 January test1 devel freeze
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/test/1.90/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/kdebase-3.1.95-0.1.i386.rpm http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/kdebase-3.2.0-1.7.i386.rpm
-- shrek-m