mtrr and ioctl - will patch help?

Arjan van de Ven arjanv at redhat.com
Fri Jul 30 06:59:48 UTC 2004


On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 03:13, Jim Cornette wrote:
> I was reading up on mtrr and ioctl because of a problem that I have with 
> starting X up when my computer is first booted. Google brought up this post.
> Subject	PATCH: fix bogus ioctl return in mtrr
> 
> This is fairly self explanatory - ENOIOCTLCMD is an internal code 
> outside of the -1 to -511 range. The correct return for an unknown ioctl 
> is -ENOTTY
> although some Linux devices return the incorrect -EINVAL result.
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/7/27/242

no that patch won't help you, if you get into that path you get an error
no matter what, it's just the exact error value that was incorrect.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040730/893770f1/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list