[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: x86_64 iso's for Test 2
- From: lewt warcry com
- To: fedora-test-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: x86_64 iso's for Test 2
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:51:13 -0500 (EST)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 05 March 2004 04:16, Lewt @ Linux Warcry wrote:
>> Unless you guys bundle core 1 with a 2.6 kernel I'm unable to use it
>> since I use SATA and FC1 or even the x86_64 FC1 does not detect.. I have
>> both Promise and Silicon Image controlers.. no beans..
>
> Try again. FC1 x86_64 was built with a newer kernel that has the libata
> patch built in. At our labs we're able to install to Promise sata
> (controller based, not raid), as well as VIA, and some intel ICH5 chips.
>
> - --
> Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
> Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)
> GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
>
> Was I helpful? Let others know:
> http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD0DBQFASKaP4v2HLvE71NURAt6IAJUSPtVH1h60luC+r9qzea2o0FUEAJiYU44C
> XsFYJZFAMxzDTHXQ0gdb
> =Lyu4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
Perhaps there's a boot option I should be using? Anyone know which?
Thanks
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]