[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: VMware with FC2T1
- From: Ben Steeves <bcs metacon ca>
- To: fedora-test-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: VMware with FC2T1
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:07:14 -0400
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 00:00, Anthony Joseph Seward wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 23:29 -0400, Ben Steeves wrote:
>
> > Anyone have any luck getting VMware 4 to work against FC2 Test 1? I
> > downloaded and ran vmware-any-any-update53.tar.gz as suggested in
> > numerous places, and I do have kernel-source installed (I'm running the
> > latest dev kernel, kernel-2.6.3-2.1.246).
> >
>
> I've been able to compile the modules for the latest beta on all of the
> FC2 kernels that I've tried so far (after having applied the update you
> mention, of course).
>
> You do not need the kernel-source rpm to compile modules for the 2.6
> kernels.
>
> > vmware-config.pl keeps complaining about not being able to find
> > '/usr/src/linux-2.6.3-2.1.246/include/linux/version.h', which, indeed,
> > does not appear to exist.
> >
>
> It should be looking for
> /lib/modules/2.6.3-2.1.246/build/include/linux/version.h, which is part
> of the kernel rpm.
OK -- I *am* dumb. Now that I'm using the right directory, it's still
complaining:
What is the location of the directory of C header files that match your
running
kernel? [/usr/src/linux/include]
/lib/modules/2.6.3-2.1.246/build/include
The kernel defined by this directory of header files does not have the
same
address space size as your running kernel.
...this is very odd, since I just re-installed the kernel package.
Would the fact that I'm running an Athlon XP cause this? I don't think
so, but I'm running out of things to blame besides my own stupidity.
Ben
--
Ben Steeves _ bcs metacon ca
The ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) ben steeves unb ca
against HTML e-mail X GPG ID: 0xB3EBF1D9
http://www.metacon.ca/ascii / \ Yahoo Messenger: ben_steeves
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]