[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: kernel-2.6.5-1.332
- From: Alex Kiernan <alex kiernan thus net>
- To: fedora-test-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: kernel-2.6.5-1.332
- Date: 04 May 2004 13:47:58 +0100
Dave Jones <davej redhat com> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:13, Alex Kiernan wrote:
>
> > > > > > Worse case you could always take a picture of it if you've a digital
> > > > > > camera handy. I don't usually encourage this, but it's better than
> > > > > > nothing as a last resort.
> > > > > Thats bad :)
> > > > > I'll get a serial console on it - its local, I just need to find the
> > > > > right cables for my laptop.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the effort.
> > > >
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121350
> > >
> >
> > Just tried the current bk tree - it boots/runs fine, so whatever the
> > problem was looks like its fixed upstream or its some problem the
> > Fedora patches introduce.
>
> Hmm, more head scratching. We're going to do one final rebase to 2.6.6
> when that's out later this week, and that's what we're rolling with for
> FC2 GA, (Additional patches from upstream will be cherry-picked).
>
> Will be interesting to see if the next kernel that we push out fixes
> it for you too. If it doesn't, then it is something we added which is
> bogus.
>
2.6.5-1.349 is working fine, so whatever it was it looks like its
fixed.
--
Alex Kiernan, Principal Engineer, Development, THUS plc
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]