[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 2.6.5-1.349 ignores selinux=0



On Tue, 4 May 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote:

> Interesting - the CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM option is not set in
> the kernel configuration in the corresponding kernel SRPM, so the
> selinux=0 support is disabled.

I don't know why this is disabled now.  Arjan?



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris redhat com>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]