Inclusion of mono

[Konstantin Ryabitsev]

Maynard Kuona wrote:
> It would also serve as a good way to test until it is
> included if it will ever be included.

I think this is actually where RH legal department will be quite useful. 
A lot of debate is whether Ximian MONO is actually a good thing for 
Linux, or whether we're heading straight for a Microsoft patent 
mousetrap. I am of the latter opinion, but it would be good to know what 
people actually versed in legalism think about this.

Regards,
-- 
Konstantin ("Icon") Ryabitsev
Duke Physics Systems Admin, RHCE
I am looking for a job in Canada!
http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/cajob.ptml
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040505/206f173d/attachment.sig>