[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: 2.6.5-1.349 ignores selinux=0
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv redhat com>
- Cc: James Morris <jmorris redhat com>, Stephen Smalley <sds epoch ncsc mil>, For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: 2.6.5-1.349 ignores selinux=0
- Date: 07 May 2004 01:47:21 -0300
On May 4, 2004, Arjan van de Ven <arjanv redhat com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:11:26AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 May 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>
>> > Interesting - the CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM option is not set in
>> > the kernel configuration in the corresponding kernel SRPM, so the
>> > selinux=0 support is disabled.
>>
>> I don't know why this is disabled now. Arjan?
> isn't this obsoleted by the /etc/sysconfig/selinux thing in SysVinit ?
If you manage to get that far...
But if the policy is messed up in such a way that you can no longer
boot, not even in single user, it can get tricky to fix if there's no
way to disable selinux from the boot command line.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]