Le sam 15/05/2004 Ã 16:58, Bruce P. Morin a Ãcrit : > Listen, > > I completely understand that the project is backed by RedHat and is > community driven. Debian is also community driven and they have three paths, > stable, testing and sid. With each of them, I have gotten most if not all > common hardware to work without much effort, depending on the path. > > What I am saying here is that Firewire is not uncommon minority hardware, > and for a stable release of anything not to support it is poor. How long has > it been available?? > You should forward this mail to the lkml. > As for working for 0 dollars well, I guess if you want something that works > out of the box, then Microsoft is the way to go. The old saying goes "You > get what you pay for." Hopefully Microsoft doesn't follow this list, > comments like that regarding the kernel, or better yet, "Sadly the code > isn't as great." By David Jones, is fodder for the Microsoft propaganda > machine. > > Another Love it or leave it attitude: > Yes. Fedora have objectives and finite ressources. You are not agree with Fedora's objectives. So pick another distribution or fork Fedora. Anyway, I hope Linux hackers will fix this issue and then you'll be back. > "If Fedora doesn't fit your needs, then use another distribution" > > Critical comments, product comparisons, etc, help build better software. > Unfortunately after looking at the amount of flames I received as well as > the many others who bring forth Fedora's shortcomings only to receive such > remarks really demonstrate why most users will NEVER have Linux on their > desktop. > Fedora (and RedHat) is not GNU/Linux. RedHat/Fedora is only a small part of the GNU/Linux community. PS : sorry for my poor english.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=