[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: final release - p2p or mirrors
- From: Jim Cornette <redhat-jc insight rr com>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: final release - p2p or mirrors
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 22:53:29 -0400
Pedro Fernandes Macedo wrote:
Jim Cornette wrote:
Would this be like a partition with no prior data installed? A
partition previously formatted and mounted to a specified point. Say,
for example /mnt/bittorrent?
Having a low fragmentation level would be desirable goal for a to be
created CD set.
I'm not sure.. The latest version of bittorrent (according to the
homepage) , allocates space when it is needed , instead of allocating
all the space when starting the download. This can now lead to high
fragmentation (as any file changing size can be fragmented)...
So the space allocation was setting aside a certain number of gigabytes
(mbytes or whatever) in bittorrent for the transfer. Whaver bytes were
retrieved were placed into the set aside space in the location that the
final ISO image would be located on the media used for receiving the
image. This resulting in a less fragmented transfer. Now it is
dynamically located and might throw the retrieved bytes wherever the
next available media spot is.
I was thinking along the lines of a fresh partition and pointing
bittorrent to the specified newly created partition. (misunderstood
allocating space ahead of time.)
Thanks for pointing out the safegaurds setup for a transfer of this
type. Would the unmatching chunks be discarded or would the bittorrent
process be interrupted? Either way, the bittorrent does not sound as
risky as it once did. I still prefer ftp transfers from familiar
mirrors. This is mainly because with bittorrent, you have to learn how
to open ports for the torrent, people are pulling bits from my
machine, I am pulling bits from machines that are unfamiliar to me.
The bad chunks are simply discarded and the download continues. These
chunks are then downloaded from other sources and this is repeated
untill you get the full file , with the correct checksum... It's the
same idea behind the protocol used in xmule/amule/emule/edonkey.
Download each part , check it and download from someone else if it is
not valid.
Thanks for the info.
Jim
--
Pedro Macedo
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]