Le jeu 27/05/2004 Ã 09:56, Paul Nasrat a Ãcrit : > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:10:42PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >>>>> "sv" == seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu> writes: > > > > sv> ugh - kernel-source changed ARCH?! How did that happen? > > > > Perhaps RPM can now build subpackages with architectures different > > than that of the main package. It's certainly been a wishlist item > > for ages. > > Nope - the kernel rpm has to be built with multiple targets anyway for the multiple archs noarch is just another conditional target. > > This is a good thing - on ppc atm I had 3 soon to be 4 identical kernel-source > packages. As for 2.6 we ship the whole tree anyway making it noarch is a good thing. > It's good thing for FC3. But switching from kernel-source.i386 to kernel-source.noarch during FC2 break updates with yum (This is enforced with the default configuration of yum (exactarch=1)). OK, kernel-source is not dedicated to newbi. > Paul >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=