Another NetworkManager question
Charles R. Anderson
cra at WPI.EDU
Tue Nov 9 02:39:42 UTC 2004
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 09:29:33PM -0500, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 10:02 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Amitabha Roy wrote:
> > > How is it possible that iwconfig and NM applet show conflicting information ?
> > > In this case at least a 30% signal strength means that NM applet information
> > > is actually incorrect.
> >
> > Orinoco cards have problems. My orinoco card (and I've had the same
> > report from 2 other people) will refuse to associate with an AP when its
> > strength is low. However, it will report being connected to an AP when it
> > clearly cannot be. For example:
> >
>
> hmmmm. I have a Symbol wireless card which uses orinoco_cs. At this
> point (after having several problems with said driver/card and
> NetworkManager, and reading comments like Dan's...), I'm thinking I need
> to use a better driver. Are there better alternatives to orinoco_cs?
> Would NdisWrapper be a better choice?
My Symbol LA4111 card was working fine with orinoco_cs back in FC2 or
early FC3test I believe. Something changed, and I couldn't get it to
work with test3 and later IIRC.
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list